Ganjar Pranowo Emphasizes the Function of Political Parties in Democracy

During the campaign period, participants in the elections, including political parties, candidate members of legislative bodies, and presidential and vice-presidential candidates, must adhere to various rules and prohibitions.

Ganjar mentioned, “Believe me, there is no freedom without political events. He described that the positioning of political events is identified by their interests, and it is up to each party to make such decisions. He worried the importance of political education and learning for the public, which remains a vital task for political events.

“Expect you end up being president, will you establish a human civil liberties tribunal? Ganjar asked Prabowo (http://www.merdeka.com) throughout the first governmental discussion held at the KPU RI workplace in Jakarta on Tuesday, December 12, 2023.
It’s biased, and your operating mate has been managing this problem all along, and if the decision is to hold a human civil liberties tribunal, there’s no issue,” Prabowo responded.

Governmental candidate Ganjar Pranowo reviewed the function of political events in democracy, highlighting their value in the sustainability of democratic procedures. According to him, political parties are essential for the performance of democracy.
Ganjar mentioned, “Think me, there is no freedom without political events. Whether we like it or not, political parties act as aggregators, sources of political ability, and systems for political education and learning.” He made this statement throughout the governmental debate at the General Election Compensation (KPU) office in Jakarta on Tuesday, December 12, 2023.
He described that the positioning of political events is identified by their interests, and it depends on each celebration to make such decisions. Ganjar highlighted that concerns like being in the resistance or otherwise are primarily driven by the parties’ rate of interests and organizing conferences. He emphasized the value of political education for the public, which remains a crucial job for political celebrations.
Ganjar Pranowo, the presidential prospect number 3, also shared the results of his project trip alongside his vice-presidential running companion, Mahfud MD, which started from the easternmost point of Indonesia in Sabang to the western factor in Merauke.
He shared his preparedness to improve all public facilities, from healthcare to education and learning, throughout the country. Ganjar and Mahfud started their project trip with the objective of paying attention to the direct ambitions of individuals.
Ganjar recounted an experience in Merauke, where he fulfilled a pastor that likewise functioned as a midwife due to the absence of medical care accessibility in the area. The priest had learned to aid a mom in childbirth by seeing YouTube video clips. In response, Ganjar assured to apply a program of one medical care employee per village.
In Sabang, Mahfud came across instructors that were not getting sufficient attention from the federal government. Ganjar emphasized the demand for higher interest and assistance for these teachers, highlighting the value of resolving their issues.
Ganjar Pranowo’s project trip aimed to get in touch with individuals, recognize their requirements, and translate those insights into actionable policies. He emphasized the importance of receptive governance that addresses the actual concerns faced by the Indonesian population.

Anies also mentioned his commitment to combating corruption in government. He proposed carrying out a rewarding system, which involves impoverishing corrupt people while rewarding whistleblowers. Anies especially stated completing the draft of the Property Seizure Costs (RUU Perampasan Aset) and applying it to hold corrupt individuals accountable. He emphasized the requirement to engage the public in the fight versus corruption, enabling people to report corruption situations and receive incentives for their support.

Anies highlighted that contamination degrees differ significantly in different areas of Jakarta, suggesting that there are variables beyond regional contamination resources. He emphasized the importance of carrying out pollution control steps based on clinical expertise and information, entailing researchers in the decision-making procedure.

Anies insisted that the root causes of contamination in Jakarta are based on information and scientific study, not fictional cases. He recognized that there are air pollution sources within the city yet directed out that if these sources were only responsible, pollution degrees must remain consistent over time, offered the stable number of car in the city.

Additionally, Anies required the revision of the Corruption Elimination Payment (KPK) Regulation to reinforce the establishment’s capability to satisfy its anti-corruption mandate. He additionally worried the value of maintaining high ethical standards for KPK management.

Prabowo had suggested that if wind were the reason for air pollution, there would certainly be no demand for a government. In action, Anies stressed the significance of depending on information and clinical proof in dealing with air pollution issues.