[rafaelbischof12Participant]

Anies mentioned these 2 occasions, highlighting that justice has not been felt, especially by the targets’ family members.
Ganjar replied to the concern, expressing his positive outlook in supplying justice for the victims and their households. He mentioned, “I think these two issues have actually ended up being public talk. In Kanjuruhan, we can meet fact-finders to shield targets, resolve their concerns from a justice viewpoint, including KM5When we settle all this, we move a step ahead. Can we then go after legal processes and locate fair decisions? My response is of course,” he said in the governmental discussion on Tuesday (12/12/2023).
Ganjar highlighted that the government has to be vibrant in resolving these situations to stop previous problems from dragging on and being repetitively raised in presidential arguments. “The government needs to risk to not let previous problems remain and become sensitive issues as a result of indecisiveness. We must quit these approaches and be vibrant and decisive,” Ganjar mentioned.
Let’s reintroduce the UU KKR, so that all human rights concerns can be fixed in this method, enabling the country to advance without being held back by unresolved problems. We should fix them,” said Ganjar.
However, Anies took into consideration Ganjar’s feedback to be insufficient, specifying that the concern is a lot more complicated. According to Anies, 4 points need to be done: ensuring the legal process supplies justice, disclosing all realities for closure, compensating victims, and guaranteeing such occurrences don’t recur.
Anies added, “We should not be vague. If these four jobs are needed, the first thing we may have to do is reinvestigate, evaluate, and make sure the safety of institutions.
Ganjar replied, “Concerning comprehensiveness, it’s a matter of preference and subjectivity.” He thought that mostly all points elevated by Anies were already being addressed.
“Sufferer protection is underway, and fact-finders are in place. If we’re discussing stopping reoccurrence, I believe that’s a worth we show. We’re dealing with whatever. I’m a person that’s never vague, constantly decisive and uncomplicated. We don’t hesitate, so we likewise made clear inquiry number 2 due to the fact that we’re not ones to postpone or hang benefit it to come to be an asset. I work with it,” Ganjar securely stated.

During the presidential discussion hung on Tuesday, December 12, 2023, governmental prospect Prabowo Subianto talked about the complex concern of taking care of conflicts in Papua. Prabowo acknowledged that dealing with Papua is a difficult issue with international interference and emphasized the relevance of human legal rights (HAM) as the primary problem, focusing on the protection of individuals.
Nonetheless, according to Ganjar Pranowo, the solutions suggested by Prabowo are not sufficient. Ganjar revealed his point of view that discussion is vital to bring together all stakeholders to resolve the concern efficiently.
Ganjar’s declaration during the discussion was as follows: “In my point of view, Mr. Prabowo, it does not appear to be enough. Dialogue is something crucial to make sure that all parties can sit with each other, as it is the root of the trouble. Do you concur with the dialogue model I am recommending?”
Along with his response throughout the discussion, Ganjar Pranowo, http://www.merdeka.com, additionally shared his experiences from his project route with his running mate, Mahfud Md. They started a trip from the easternmost point in Sabang to Merauke in the west, intending to listen to and observe the hopes and needs of the people.
Ganjar revealed his commitment to boosting all public centers, from medical care to education, based on the ambitions and comments got throughout their campaign. He highlighted a heartwarming encounter in Merauke, where a neighborhood pastor functioned as a midwife as a result of the lack of medical care access. This priest discovered to help a mommy in giving birth by enjoying training video clips on YouTube. Ganjar pledged to carry out a program of one healthcare worker per town to deal with such challenges.
Furthermore, Ganjar Pranowo mentioned an issue discovered during their browse through to Sabang, where they found that instructors were not getting adequate focus and support from the federal government. He stressed the need for raised attention and support around.
Finally, Ganjar Pranowo responded to Prabowo Subianto’s technique to managing the Papua problem by highlighting the importance of discussion and expressed his commitment to addressing various public issues, specifically in medical care and education, based upon his campaign experiences.

Presidential candidate second, Prabowo Subianto, highlights the value of legislation, civils rights (HAM), enhancing government solutions, combating corruption, and safeguarding all sections of society in his vision-mission.

Ganjar’s declaration throughout the discussion was as complies with: “In my opinion, Mr. Prabowo, it does not appear to be sufficient. Ganjar shared his dedication to improving all public facilities, from health care to education, based on the desires and feedback got during their project. Ganjar vowed to apply a program of one healthcare employee per village to resolve such obstacles.

[Author]

Posts